login
  • SUBSCRIBER
  • User Name
  • Password
  • Remember Me
ad
20 Aug 2017, 19:03 HRS IST
|
IIT accepts resignation of whistle-blower Prof Rajeev Kumar whose compulsory retirement order was quashed by Pranab Mukherjee days before he demited office as prezWe will take strict against our staff if they are found guilty: JamshedInitial report will come by this evening: Md Jamshed on the inquiry into Utkal Express derailmentRailway Commissioner (Safety) will also find out whether laid down rules were followed or not: JamshedRailway Commissioner, Safety, will ascertain what type of maintenance work was being carried out on the track in his detailed probe: JamshedSome maintenance work was going on, which might have caused derailment of Utkal Express: Mohd Jamshed, Member, Traffic
  • PTI
add
add

    • SC to hold final hearing in Ayodhya title dispute from Dec 5

    •  Share
    • Print Print
    •  E-mail
    • Comments Comment
    • [ - ] Text [ + ]
    16:35 HRS IST

    New Delhi, Aug 11 (PTI) The Supreme Court today decided to hold the final hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid title dispute from December 5 and made it clear that no adjournment shall be given in any circumstance.

    The apex court, after an intense deliberation for more than one-and-half-hours, reached a consensus on commencement of the hearing on the cross-appeals filed against the 2010 judgement of the Allahabad High Court.

    The high court had ruled a three-way division of the disputed 2.77 acre area at Ayodhya among the parties -- the Sunni Waqf Board, the Nirmohi Akhara and the Ram Lalla.

    A specially constituted bench, headed by Justice Dipak Misra, asked the contesting parties to complete the translation of the exhibits of the documents likely to be relied upon into English within 12 weeks since these were in eight different languages.

    The bench, also comprising justices Ashok Bhushan and Abdul Nazeer, asked the Uttar Pradesh government to complete within 10 weeks the translation of the evidence recorded for adjudication of the title dispute in the high court into English.

    The bench made it clear that the parties would have to strictly adhere to the time frame fixed by it and no adjournment shall be given in any circumstances.

    Senior counsel C S Vaidyanathan, appearing for Lord Ram Lalla and Additional Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the UP government, pressed for early hearing of the matter, but senior advocates Kapil Sibal, Anoop George Chaudhari and Rajeev Dhavan, representing other parties, were not in favour of commencement of the hearing before January next year.

    • Post your comments